| Term 2003-2006
			
				| Highlights | Commission Chair |  
				| Commission 1 looks back to a very successful period 2002 – 
				2006. Many presentations at all FIG events were made. Lots of 
				discussions took place and mutual understanding between 
				colleagues from different regions and cultures have been 
				strengthened. Not all our wishes of an ambitious work plan have 
				become reality but there is always another term.  |  | Mr. 
    Klaus Rürup |  Thanks to the very active vice chairs commission 1 achieved 
			a lot as you can see below. But there remains one problem: How to 
			get more surveyors active in commission work? Sometimes it looks 
			like depending on the place of venue whether it is attractive or 
			not, whether expected discussions in that region are worth going 
			there or not.  All members of commission 1 took benefit out of the fact widening 
		their own horizon, seeing different cultures and learning how surveyors 
		in different regions solve their problems in different ways. All members 
		of commission 1 should receive a big thank you for their commitment to 
		FIG and to the work in commission 1.  Commission 1 is dedicated to all fields of professional activities and 
therefore has a commitment to raising issues of general interest that apply 
across the activities of all commissions. There are many areas of overlap of 
interest and this supports cooperative involvement in other commissions 
activities. The title 'professional practice' is a clear indication of the wide 
breadth of aspects to be handled. Terms of reference
  Professional practice, legal aspects and organisational structuresStandards and certificationProject-management, quality and best practiceInformation technology management as it relates to professional practiceSupport of under-represented groups and fair competition Mission statement
  Capability of development: Changes are affecting the operation of 
  surveying practices, their management and their professional structures under 
  the challenges of widening professional activities.Change of technology: Managing processes and infrastructure with ever 
  changing business infrastructures in the areas of IT, internet, networks and 
  total quality management.Improving surveyors' reputation: Supporting the essential dialogue between 
  politicians and surveyors with regard to further development and setting up 
  the own business in strengthening surveyors' role in economy and politics.Under represented groups: To focus public attention on under represented 
  groups by surveying activities taking place to improve representation. The Objectives for the Work Plan are to undertake the terms of reference in 
order to: 
  Involve the wider community in the work of commission 1 recognising it's 
  role in getting the basic professional building blocks in place for 
  practitioners;Develop collaborative work practices between professionals;Build networks with member associations, related societies and 
  organizations to improve professional practice and standards;Foster intercommissional cooperation;Recruit active and enthusiastic people to work with Commission 1 in 
  progressing its mission. Working Group 1.1 - FIG Standards NetworkPolicy issue
  Developing the involvement of practising surveyors in the development and 
  use of standardsIncreasing the influence of surveyors on key international standardisation 
  bodiesBuilding the linkage between FIG workplans and standardisation activitiesAdvising FIG officers and members on standards and standardisationSupporting the implementation of FIG's policy on standards Specific projects
  Continuing to research the most effective way to influence the 
  standardisation process, building relationships with member associations and 
  sister societies as necessaryCoordinating FIG's input to and relationship with ISO (in particular TC211 
  and TC172 SC6) and IVSCWorking with Commissions to provide appropriate briefings to FIG's members 
  on developing and recently published standardsMaintaining and updating a standards area on the FIG website and the FIG 
  Guide on Standardisation AchievementsThe last four years have seen very significant consolidation and 
		maturing of FIG’s work in a number of standards-related areas as 
		summarised in this report. The Network has played a key role in raising 
		the profile of standards in FIG, and the profile of FIG in 
		standardisation activity. The imminent submission of FIG work on the 
		core cadastral domain model to ISO for progressing to an international 
		standard marks a further development. The Network intends to continue 
		the process of developing a clear shared understanding of FIG’s 
		priorities and required actions in the area of standardisation, and will 
		continue to shape this as a common agenda with the Commissions.  Chair
			
				|  | Iain Greenway Ireland
 igreenway[at]compuserve.com
 |  
 Working Group 1.2 - Professional practice and organisational 
structuresPolicy issue
  Widening professional activities, overcome restrictionsEuropean and world-wide limitations, monitoring the legal development 
  (i.e. GATS, EC Treaty, other relevant policies)Dialogue between politicians and surveyors, as well as public private 
  partnership. Specific projects
  Fundamentals of legal frameworks to be presented in a paper. (2002)Professional studies, business structures, bans or restrictions to be 
  investigated. Facts to be collected for development of a paper. (2003)Recommendations on behalf of less developed countries, acknowledgement by 
  developed countries, how structural and legal processes might be possible. 
  Models to be proposed. (2004)Acknowledgement of the requirements of governments /survey departments - 
  necessary information provided as a basis for surveyors to deal with the legal 
  developments and future requirements. (2005)Review Publication 29 on Business Practices and determine whether there is 
  a need to update it. (2005)Synthesis of the research undertaken (Munich 2006) AchievementsIn the period 2002 – 2006 papers have been regularly presented. The 
		main aspect was put on the development policies and the role of FIG as 
		an expert NGO.  The legal framework of all issues concerning land management can be 
		examined but no influence on the legislation is possible for an expert 
		member of FIG - the politics of the countries is too far away to be 
		reached by FIG.  As a general conclusion it has to be stated, that also in the 
		surveying business, the “revenue oriented business” is the most 
		important goal. This is not surprising in developed countries – but in 
		less developed countries this attitude leads to uncontrolled and 
		uncoordinated activities – as could be seen in many countries.  The role of FIG should nevertheless be to impose itself as a leader 
		and expert NGO in Land Management issues. To achieve this, a further FIG 
		Commission has to be established just to follow this goal and to 
		coordinate independently the work in lesser developed countries.  Experiences: Due to difficult collaboration and experiences made by 
		other working groups all work and finding have been done by one person 
		in the working group.  Chair
			
				|  | Michael Keller Switzerland
 Mkeller[at]ipg.ch
 |  
 Working Group 1.3 - Information technology management as it 
relates to professional practice and communicationsPolicy issue
  Identifying the impact of IT, Internet and e-commerce on the profession 
  and determining strategies for dealing with the impact.Communicating effectively to the FIG community including using the 
  Homepage of Commission 1Development of Knowledge Management concepts as a way of working more 
  effectively. Specific projects
  Produce a communication and marketing plan for Commission 1 activities to 
  support its work and ensure that key messages are being received by member 
  organizations and that two way communication channels are operating. This to 
  be prepared in 2002Impact of IT, Internet and e-commerce impact on the profession to be 
  reported with recommended strategies for dealing with the impact.Ongoing development and refinement of the Commission 1 Homepage to be 
  undertaken by Co-Chair.Review of Knowledge Management concepts and how they could be used in 
  practice AchievementsThe most important event was that we were able as commission 1 to 
		open wide the gate to new cultures and regional groups to present their 
		different views to the profession with variable levels of ethics and 
		standards. Looking to these varieties I started a project financed by USAID and 
		AMEDEAST “Surveyors and development, new vision for codes of ethics and 
		standards”. This project, that I will develop to try to make it an 
		international reference from Commission 1, included about 24 
		presentations all around Lebanon then many presentations in Jordan, 
		Egypt, Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia. Also I have organized the second 
		international Conference in Beirut on September 2004 with the 
		participation of 12 Arab delegations and about 6 other European from 
		France, Germany, Czech Republic, Cyprus, Cameroon and Italy.  In this conference I have launched the first initiative to the new 
		Commission 1 Work Plan with my presentation “Role of Surveyor, a Human 
		Vision beyond the Technique”.  Commission 1 was also present and active in the regional conference 
		in Ghana where vice chairs Dietmar Sperling, Leonie Newnham, Iain 
		Greenway and Stephen Djaba were participating to that event as well as 
		the chair-elect Yaacoub Saade representing the Chair Klaus Rürup and 
		Commission 1 presented a summary about the next work plan and organized 
		a workshop that introduced this commission to new members and African 
		organizations that welcomed the new visions of Commission 1 and 
		supported the issues that we are defending.  During that event we had a meeting of the new Francophone Federation 
		(FGF, Fédération des Géomèters Francophones) and we were able to 
		convince this young federation to cooperate with FIG and Commission 1 in 
		the development of its issues regarding the liberal practice of the 
		profession. Waiting for the term of office 2006-2010 to launch the new 
		work plan of our commission we will try to make from FIG and Commission 
		especially a professional reference for the humanism of the profession 
		to conserve the real and glorious character of the role of a surveyor.
		 Chair
			
				|  | Chair: Yaacoub Saade
 Lebanon
 comandoo1[at]yahoo.com
 |  
				| 
  | Co-Chair: Stephen Djaba
 Ghana
 Stephen[at]ghana.com
 |  
 
 Working Group 1.4 - International project management (Joint 
Activity with Commission 10)Policy issue
  Ability of professionals to work as effectively as possible in 
  multifaceted projects as such projects are an important component of 
  professional service delivery.Working with people, communicating messages, moving towards more 
  collaborative work processes as the world of the professional and the type of 
  work undertaken expands into other related areas.Being aware of current good practice, how it can be implemented across a 
  variety of delivery systems and communicating this to professionals.Knowing what quality management is and being provided with resources to 
  assist in applying this in diverse work situations. Specific projects
  Development of a project management resource detailing the major facets of 
  project management delivery as it applies to the profession in conjunction 
  with Commission 10 and using an interactive review process with FIG Member 
  Associations.Research case studies in project management across regions of the world in 
  conjunction with Commission 10 with the aim of preparing a resource for use by 
  members in learning about and discussing project management issues.Establish a collaborative work site to develop a community of interest 
  group that can work across member organisations to share information on 
  current good practice and quality management in theory and practice. Outcomes 
  of this to contribute to FIG's approach to world's good practice. AchievementsThe International Project Management Working Group has been 
		concentrating on exploring the management of change and innovation 
		through project management. To this end a number of papers were produced 
		over the four years involving those involved in industry change and 
		development using case studies to identify key issues that might be 
		relevant for professionals as they participate in the continually 
		evolving land management environment.  The model of the land management paradigm (Enemark, 2004) has been 
		used as an organising vehicle to explore changes in policy frameworks, 
		land information infrastructure and land administration functions. This 
		has encouraged debate and discussion around these areas across 
		Commissions and has involved Commissions 1, 2, 7 and 10 throughout the 
		four year term and other organisations such as the Australian Spatial 
		Sciences Institute.  The working group has created a core group of those interested in 
		innovation and change across the world and my thanks go to them for 
		their valuable contribution through this period.  At the congress in Munich in October 2006 a joint paper for 
		Commission 1 and 10 will review cross country comparisons exploring 
		change management issues in large land management projects titled ‘Changing 
		the World We See Through Land and Building Project Management’. This 
		will clarify the importance of land management professionals in 
		implementing major changes and the importance of their roles as change 
		agents. Another paper will publish a guide for professionals in managing 
		change issues consolidating things learned from the last 4 years.  Chair
			
				|  | Leonie Newnham Australia
 Leonie.Newnham[at]nre.vic.gov.au
 |  
 Working Group 1.5 - Under-represented Groups in Surveying 
  (Joint working group with other FIG Technical Commissions)Policy issue
  Survey the role of minorities in the world of surveying and the benefit of 
  diversity.Analyse the present status of under-represented groups and be aware of 
  good practices concerning the support of under-represented groups in FIG 
  member associations, in professions and at universities.Enhance fair competition for minority groups. Specific Projects
  Continuing with a FIG network for under-represented groups in surveying to 
  enhance the distribution of information.Intensify the work within the FIG Commissions to support women and 
  cultural and language minorities.Evaluation of FIG Washington Congress registration concerning gender, age, 
  commissions and continents.Organise joint Commission working group meetings or workshops during the 
  working weeks. AcievementsBeneath the quarterly Newsletter (www.fig.net/organisation/tf/underrep/index.asp) 
		the main task of the Joint Commission Working Group 1.5 on 
		Under-represented Groups in Surveying during the last year was the 
		preparation of Guidelines to Enhance the Representation of 
		Under-Represented Groups in FIG. They are a result of consultations and 
		the efforts of a number of experts and contributors, led by the Chair of 
		the Working Group. The Guidelines contain FIG Gender Policies, FIG Young 
		Surveyors' Policies and FIG Minorities Policies as well as Case Studies 
		and Good Practices.  The Working Group 1.5 and the Task Force before have undertaken 
		several initiatives, such as the quarterly newsletter promoting the 
		participation and perspectives of women, youth and minorities, 
		demonstrating its increasing commitment to diversity in representation 
		and plurality in perspective. However, it can learn from case studies 
		from surveying organisations around the world which provide good 
		practices in this respect. In this section, examples of best practice 
		from professional associations, public institutions and universities 
		from a number of countries across the globe are showcased. It is not 
		intended to be a representative sample, but rather a collection of 
		experiences from countries in which FIG representation has been easy to 
		obtain.  The Draft Guidelines are adopted by the Council of FIG and will be 
		presented during the FIG Congress 2006 in Munich.  Chair
			
				|  | Gabriele Dasse Germany
 g.dasse[at]gmx.de
 |  |